June 12, 2003 — U.S. kids were superior off in 2000 than they were in 1990. But they’re doing way better in a few states than in others.
The findings come from the 2003 form of the Kids Count Information Book, a venture by the nonprofit Annie E. Casey Foundation. It rates the well-being of American kids on several scales.
Overall, U.S. kids were way better off during the 1990s. Will the slant proceed? The study’s authors are worried.
“Portion of the change is without a doubt due to the solid economy of the 1990s,” the report notes. “But various programs were actualized or expanded during the 1990s that were planned to prevent a few of the negative outcomes that are the center of the Kids Number Data Book. As state lawmakers over the country struggle with difficult budget choices this year, it is vital that we do not make rushed program cuts that invert [these] improvements.”
Here are a few of the study’s measures of child well-being — and the states that did best and most exceedingly bad:
Over the 1990s, 20% more children lived in a home where at slightest one parent had a full-time, year-round job. But one in four kids needed a parent with a consistent job. Best states: Iowa, Maryland, and Minnesota. Most exceedingly bad states: Louisiana, West Virginia. In 1990, 20% of U.S. kids lived in destitution. That fell as it were somewhat, to 17%, in 2000. Best states: Modern Hampshire. Worst states: Louisiana, Mississippi, and Unused Mexico. The U.S. infant mortality rate dropped from 9.2 to 6.9 passings per 1,000 live births. Best state: Massachusetts (4.6 deaths per 1,000 births). Most exceedingly bad state: Mississippi (10.7 passings per 1,000 births). Deaths in children aged 1-14 dropped 29% since 1990. Best state: Vermont. Most exceedingly bad state: Mississippi. The percentage of youngsters not in school and not working dropped from 10% in 1990 to 8% in 2000. In any case, Oregon saw a 29% increment in idle high schoolers. Best state: Utah. Most noticeably awful state: Louisiana.